Sunday, October 12, 2014

Thoughts on Telecommunication Industry

Telecommunication Industry :

While Going through the Value line survey about telecommunication industry, it became obvious and more clear which most value investors already know that its a tough industry to be in. I haven't done detailed research into all the companies but these are just the thoughts that came to mind as I went through the pages. 




1. Lots of intense competition. At&T remains the leader with Verizon at 2nd, Sprint at 3rd and T -mobil at 4th. There is price war going on right now. But At&T and Verizon has advantage due to the size and economy of scale which becomes obvious when you look at the numbers. 

2. Asset intensive businesses with lot of re investments required just t stay competitive. 

3. Net profit margins are not great even for larger companies.  On average At&T net margins are at 10.5% and 11.7 % for Verizon, most others are lower than these two. 

4. ROE is also comparable to S&P, At&T had ROE in past in rage of 12-13 % and now at 14.5% , Verizon traditionally did better with ROE 16-19% but now at 13%. Only other company is J2 Global ( will dig deeper into it) with ROE traditionally > 20% but now has declined to 10% in last 1-2 years. 

Now the Good part : 

But the management seems to realize the nature of industry too, and they aren't keeping the money for themselves. These companies pay handsome dividends and some of them has strong balance sheets, though on average they carry a lot of debt due to the nature of asset intensive business. 

At&T pays 5.4% and Verizon 4.5% dividends and these are likely to be continues, so if you are looking for safe income, these are good bets, but beyond that someone, who is looking to beat the market isn't going to do that, These aren't the typical compounding machines. 

They pay anywhere between 50 to 85 % of income as dividends ( payout ratio), and retain the rest for maintenance and growth. 

Thoughts on At&T Vs Verizon :

AT&T has actually cut dividend down only once in 2004, and Verizon has never decreased dividend since 1998, ( I only have numbers till 1998) 

When Comparing these 2 Giants, Verizon is doing better, higher revenue and earnings growth, and also Vodafone just sold its 45% interest in Verizon. So Verizon actually issued 1.274 billion Shares to Vodafone shareholders for its Verizon share. This represents approx 30% dilution in EPS, still EPS is higher this year thanks to decreasing expenses and increased net margins, 

From Morningstar

Notice the increase in Operating Margin from 11.4 to 26.5% 

So, definitely Verizon seems a better bet with also some prospects of future growth at this time, but this decision will require deeper digging into this company, which i may do in future, will put it on my watch list for now :) 


Wednesday, October 8, 2014

George H. Michaelis : Learning Value Investing from Legends

Through my usual search on Internet I came across George Michaelis and his track record while he managed Source Capital, till 1988 his record was 18.4% CAGR over 15 years, That's Awesome, but Looking at track record of the fund since 1985 to 1995, He again managed to come close to 14%. 
I found some Articles on La times about him and here is summary of it and what I liked about him and learned from him. 

Here's the Article 1990 interview with George Michaelis

Writer to George Michaelis : The lesson of this year seems to be that the rules of investing are being rewritten for the '90s, versus what we knew in the '80s. What are the big differences you see?
Michaelis: The '80s were a period in which returns on stocks were above average, primarily because valuations expanded. Yes, there was economic growth in the '80s, but a major contribution to above-average stock returns came from valuation expansion.
I don't think anyone can time the market. What the current situation requires is that you lengthen your time horizon. If I'm right about a company, three years from now we'll be in good shape. But it might be that long. This is a period where chances are you're going to look stupid in the short run.
Buy Wonderful business when they are going through temporary trouble. Market will hate it and the Price will be cheap, that's when we buy it, We may look stupid buying it when the rest of the market is buying expensive stocks which are getting more and more expensive everyday. 

Writer : OK, so you're looking for stocks that are bargains relative to the companies' true potential. How do you judge them?
Michaelis: I'm driven primarily by the quality of the business I invest in. Value investing has two dimensions. Either you're interested in buying assets, or in buying earnings power. I'm not interested in buying assets. I buy earnings power; that's what works for me. I'm really only interested in buying a business where there's a proven record of high rates of return on equity. I don't look for rapid growth areas. I look for good businesses.

 He talks about two approaches 
1. Buying assets at cheap price - Graham strategy 
2. Buying earning power of quality businesses - Buffett / Fisher Strategy 

Both of them works, you need to see what suits you the best.

Writer : What about stocks versus bonds now? I can earn 8.5% interest annually on a Treasury bond. Will stocks do that well?
Michaelis: On any long-term basis, stocks should do better than bonds. Now, over the next five years will stocks do better than an 8.5% yield? Probably, but it could be close. But you have to remember that, long term, bonds will not protect you against inflation. The reason to own stocks is to hedge against a collapse of purchasing power.

Writer : No doubt there are a lot of individual investors who agree with you about value in stocks, and about being patient. But what do you say to the person who really is terrified of economic disaster ahead?
Michaelis: If you're really not confident, you shouldn't be invested in stocks. And if you can't understand the concept of return on capital, and you can't read a balance sheet, you're probably in trouble (in picking individual stocks). Most people probably are better off identifying a good mutual fund. It's worth it to spend time looking for a mutual fund that meets your risk and return objectives.
Rest of the articles if from Streetstories.com 

A self-described "value investor in really good businesses," Michaelis looks for companies with a demonstrated ability to earn high returns over the long term.
Michaelis seldom buys foreign stocks, preferring to gain exposure to foreign economies by investing in U.S. companies. "It's what you don't know that can hurt you. As you start moving outside the U.S., information is harder to access and the quality of the information is less reliable. The risks get a lot higher," he says.
Investors should buy shares in companies in which they have a comfort level and knowledge, according to Michaelis. That way, if the price falls, they will have the confidence to pick up more shares at cheaper prices.

This is very Important as most people don't do enough research into the companies they buy, they aren't sure what to do if the stock price falls. If you have done diligent research on the business and you are confident about it, there should be no doubt in your mind what to do if the price falls. If it was a good buy at $14 then its even better buy at $12 and a bargain at $7.
"If a stock drops dramatically and you don't feel like buying more," he says, "then you made a mistake to begin with."

Performance Record

18.4% over 15 years: "A calculation in the summer of 1988 showed that over the past 15 years the total return of Source Capital was exactly 3 times that of S&P 500: The gross gain was 1200%... exceeded by only 16 other funds...".

 Source : http://www.streetstories.com/george_michaelis.html


Warren Buffett was his funds largest shareholder and bought 40% of Michaelis' Source Capital Closed end fund.- seekingalpha.com



Before his Death in 1996 , He was Managing the Source Capital Fund, and the Numbers below are from their website. 

Here's the growth rate of Net asset value per share since 1985, Their Fund Tardes by Ticker SOR. Data is taken from Source capital website. 

14%  CAGR after 10 years is awesome!!! Your original 10K would have grown into 37 K 

18% and 14 % over long periods of time are way above what most managers can dream of achieving. 


His way of investing seemed very simple 

Research/ Valuation Techniques Employed

Looks at companies with these features:
1. High ROA & ROE, high ROE should be sustainable;
2. Earning power not hostage to business cycle
3. Successful for identifiable reasons. 
Debt averse - average debt level at 15% of total assets. 

If you are Interested in Learning more about him, There's only one book I could find, I jut ordered it. 
Check it out. Amazon Link to Book
Hope to learn more from him. 



Monday, September 29, 2014

COACH A BUY OR NOT

“You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.”— Ben Graham

COACH A BUY OR NOT 


Business / What the company does: 

In their own words:
Coach has grown from a family-run workshop in a Manhattan loft to a leading New York design house of modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections. Coach is one of the most recognized fine accessories brands in the U.S. and in targeted international markets. We offer premium lifestyle accessories to a loyal and engaged customer base and provide consumers with fresh, compelling and innovative products that are extremely well made, at an attractive price. Coach’s product offering uses a broad range of high quality leathers, fabrics and materials.

Coach is now selling products in Men's market and trying to make it a global lifestyle company, more on it later.

Brief History :


Founded in 1941, Coach was acquired by Sara Lee Corporation (“Sara Lee”) in 1985. In June 2000, Coach was incorporated in the state of Maryland. In October 2000, Coach was listed on the New York Stock Exchange and sold approximately 68 million shares of common stock, split adjusted, representing 19.5% of the then outstanding shares. In  April 2001, Sara Lee completed a distribution of its remaining ownership in Coach via an exchange offer , which allowed Sara Lee stockholders to tender Sara Lee common stock for Coach common stock.


Products: 

And as you can see Handbag business slowly declining and representing smaller portion of the Net sales, though still selling healthy, thanks to the International segment growth.
Also noticeable that Men's Segment now represent 14% of sales. 

Industry : 

Coach is in Luxury retail industry which has done remarkably well in the past as they don't compete on price as the rest of the retail industry does, so this is unique segment of retail. 

Competition : 

Michael Kors ( KORS) and Kate Spade are some of the noticeable competitors who are taking market share away from the Coach, there are numerous articles on Seeking alpha bout Coach and the competition its facing. 
And that's the main reason that Coach has recently lost ground to its competitors and its stock price has tumbled a lot this year from 54 to 36 at the time of writing this article. You can see from the graph below which is actually from COH annual statement that the Price performance has suffered in last 2 years.
Here the Peer group involves Gap, Guess, Tiffany, PVH, L Brands, Ralph Lauren, Williams Sonoma. Though I dont think Coach directly competes with all of them


Another thing I wanted to touch upon was 

Manufacturing :

Coach carefully balances its  commitments to  a limited  number of “better brand” partners with demonstrated integrity ,  quality and  reliable  delivery .  Our manufacturers are  located  in  many countries,  including  Vietnam,  China, the  Philippines,  India,  Thailand, Italy , Hong Kong and the United States. 
5 of these vendors supply >10% of Coach's Total Units, though these vendors may have multiple geographic locations themselves, Reason I mention it here is when I went through Its competitor Michael Kors statements they don't have any contracts like these with their suppliers. 

Highlights from latest Earnings report : 


In fiscal 2014,  we reported net sales of $4.81 billion,  net income  of $781.3 million  and net income  per diluted share of $2.79
This compares to net sales of $5.08 billion, net income of $1.03 billion, and net income per diluted share of $3.61 in fiscal 2013. 
In  fiscal  2014, the  comparability  of our operating results  has been affected  by $131.5 million  of pretax charges ($88.3  million 
after tax or $0.31 per diluted share) related to our Transformation Plan. So Non GAAP basis EPS is $3.10. In fiscal 2013, the comparability of our operating results was affected  by $53.2 million of pretax charges ($32.6  million after tax  or $0.11 per diluted share) related  to  restructuring  and transformation-related charges. So Non GAAP Earnings was $3.72 in 2013.

Operating performance for fiscal 2014 reflected a decline in revenue of 5.3%, primarily due to decreased revenues from our North  America business partially offset  by gains in  our International  businesses. 

North America Net Sales  decreased 10.9% or $377.7 million  to $3.10 billion. This decrease was primarily driven by lower comparable store sales of $460.5 million or 15% largely due to lower traffic, and lower wholesale sales of $26.1 million due to lower shipments.




Now lets Go through the steps of Stock selection to see if COH is a wonderful business. 

Do I understand what the company does, Is it beyond my circle of Competence?  

Yes I do understand and though no expert in Fashion/ Luxury Industry I am very comfortable with knowing what the company does and can relate to it. 

Does The Company has a Competitive advantage ? 


Yes, The company has been earning large profits for the shareholders year after year despite recent price decline. The margins are healthy, though there is recent decline which I think is temporary, there is no Price competition. 
A company earnings Net margins close to 20% with ROE consistently from 34% to 50 % range over last  10 year. 

Shareholder Friendly management : 


Yes, Look at the cash flow statements below and you will see management has been consistently returning money to shareholders through dividends and Share buybacks, and growing the business. Though there has been recent change in management including Lew Frankfort leaving the CEO position in 2014 and now leaving the chairman position too by end of year ( with company since 1979, CEO 1995), Victor luis joined as CEO who has been with company since 2006. 
Reed Karakoff left as executive creative director and Stuart Vevers joined in 2014.
The new management seems to take over and giving the company a new direction. COH enjoyed earnings growth over last many years through their affordable Luxury segment, which is exactly whats hurting them now, as that segment of the  business is hard to compete with Kors and Kate spade as they seem to be offering more competitive products in that price range, but now COH seems to understands that they need to stay as a Luxury brand and need to build their brand image again in their loyal customers who are usually higher income segment of the population who really doesn't care about price. 

Dividends : Started paying in 2009 at  $.08 which has increased every year to 
$ 1.35 now giving currently a Dividend Yield of 3.72% at the time this article is written. Payout ration is currently approaching 44%. 

Stock Buyback : 

Shares outstanding has gone down since 200 when it was 372 mil approx and is now 273 mil. 
During fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, the Company repurchased and retired 10.2 million and 7.1 million shares, respectively , or $524.9 million and $400.0 million of common stock, respectively , at an average cost of $51.27 and $56.61, respectively . 
 As of June 28, 2014, Coach had $836.7 million remaining in the stock repurchase program.
Is the company buying more stock when its cheap ? well its been buying the stock consistently without break, so not sure on that point. But good thing is that now that the stock is cheap and getting hammered company isn't holding back on buyback :)

Is The company Conservatively Financed :

Yes, till 2014 it had negligible debt.

Will Not need to calculate Debt to equity, Quick or current ration or Interest coverage Ratio here.


Is the Business Profitable and has a Consistent Track Record of doing so :

Yes and they have been doing it for long time. 

Now lets talk numbers: 

PE ratio is 13.06 ( from Google finance) 

Will use Dividend adjusted PEG ratio ( as the company pays healthy dividend and will continue to pay so) is depending on what growth rate you use, for simplicity lets use Yahoo Finance estimates of 5.75% for next 5 yrs. = 13.06 / ( 5.75+3.72) = 1.379


I am not going to give details on the Financials but will go through important ones. 



From 2014 Annual report 
EPS vs Diluted EPS : less than 1 % difference ( 0.72% dilution) Acceptable. 
( > 2 to 3 % is considered bad) 


From 2014 Annual report, Decrease in Margins in 2014 is obvious give the transformation company is going through and it should be temporary for things to workout in Shareholders favor. 
Company is converting every Dollar of sales into 16 Cent Free Cash now, used to be much higher.





So lets look at some more numbers :

ROA = Option 1: Net Profit Margin X Asset Turnover = Return on Assets
Option 2: Net Income ÷ Average Assets for the Period = Return on Assets
781336/3597514 = 21.71%

ROE:  lets look at DuPont model.  ROE = Net profit ratio * Asset turnover * Equity multiplier. Its The Return you will get without Equity ( ROE ).


ROE = 0.163*1.3360*1.4897= 0.3236 which is 32.44% ( Whic s ROA x Equity Multiplier )

 We can calculate this via other simpler method too:  ROE = Net Profit/ Average Shareholder Equity  =781,336[( 2,420,653 + 2,409,158)2] = 781,336/2,414,905 = 32.35% which is approx same as we calculated above. 


Growth in Equity and Book value over last 10 years.
     I will use Value line numbers for these. 

CAGR for Shareholder Equity 11.86% over last decade. 

CAGR book value is 15.09% over last decade. 

Lets also look at ROIC : ROIC  = NOPAT/Invested Capital
NOPAT = EBIT (1 - tax rate) Net operating profit after taxes.  Same as Net income with interest Expense (Net of taxes) added back.

Invested Capital = Average Debt Liabilities + Average Stockholder's Equity ( equals Equity and all Short term and long term Debt or preferred share if it exists) + Capital lease obligations


So here :  NOPAT = 1,120,074( 1- 0.304 )= 779,571

Operating Capital = Average debt of {(401.2+140.5)2} + 2,414,905 = 270.85+2,414,905 = 2,415,176 

ROIC = 779,571 / 2,415,176 = 32.278% Pretty close to our ROE


CROIC =  Free Cash Flow / Invested capital

FCF = Cash from Operations –  Total CAPEX 
Many times CAPEX can be find in cash flow as PPE
985,410 - 219,587 = 765,823 
FCF per share = 765,823/ 280,379= 2.731 

FCF can be replaced by Owner Earnings if you prefer 

Owner earnings = Net income + depreciation & amortization +/- one-time items +/- Changes in Working Capital –  Maintenance capital expenditures (Maintenance CAPEX)
= 781,336 +189,360+108,204 -162,403-189,360 = 727,137


What percentage of the Sales are represented by Amortization/Depreciation. = Amortization + Depreciation/ Sales  = 4,806,226 /189,360 = 3.94% Roughly 4 % 

Inventory and Receivables : 

COGS / Average Inventory for the Period = 1,509,263/525440.5 = 2.872 turns. 
 Coach sells its Inventory 2.87 times every year. 
Using Inventory turnover to calculate average days to sell products = 365/2.872 = Approx 127 days. 

100k Invested 10 yrs ago will be how much ? 

Its an interesting question to answer, I have done the tedious math, but the answer is approximate. 
So 100k Invested in COH yr ago will be 383,240 with Dividends reinvested, that comes out to be CAGR 14.38%

This is despite the recent price decline, Had you Backed out and sold it a year ago,
 you would have roughly 538,706 which is 18.34% CAGR over 9 yrs. 

Adjusted for Splits you would have 10,357 shares and your Dividend check alone will be 
13,983 for this year and is ready to grow next year. 

Which gives a rough Dividend yield of 14 % on Original Investment. 
Obviously  I haven't Taken Inflation into Account. 

How about Yield ? 

PE ratio is 13.06

Earnings yield ( 1/PE ) = 7.66% 

Dividend adjusted PEG ratio 1.379

Dividend Yield of 3.72% 

EBIT multiple at current price : Market cap/ EBIT = 8.91 times. 

EV/ EBIT = Here EV = (Market Cap + All Debt - Cash) = 9,528,562/1,120,074= 8.50 

FCF yield = 1/(36.33 current price/ 2.731) = 7.52% 


DCF Analysis : 


Using the last 10 yrs of FCF and taking average CAGR of 4, 5 & 7 yr period median gives me roughly 10% growth over last 10 yrs. 
will use same number going future too. though future might be Rough. Some Analysts are predicting growth rates of 4-5% 

Using terminal growth rate of 2 % for 10 yrs and 12% discount rate gives us a Fair Value of 37.59 which leaves no Margin of safety.

But as said future is hard to predict, This company isn't going anywhere in next 5- 10 yr, I am getting healthy dividends ( which will be reinvested),  I cant see worse situation in next 5 yrs for reasons outlined below. 

So How does the future looks like. 

Well the reason stock price is down because many thinks its in permanent trouble.

--Company has a Transformation Plan

Company's Transformation Plan Focus on these 4 elements 
•  Grow our business in North America and worldwide, by transforming from a leading international accessories Company into a global lifestyle brand, anchored in luxury accessories.
•  Building market share  in  markets where  Coach  is  under-penetrated,  most  notably  in  Asia  and  Europe, South America and Central America. 
•  Focus  on  the  Men’s  opportunity  for  the  brand
•  Harness  the  growing  power  of  the  digital  worldKey elements include 
www.coach.com,  our  invitation-only  outlet  Internet  site,  our  global  e-commerce  sites,  marketing sites  and  social media. 

--COH is focusing on selling more higher priced handbag:  here's an answer to question asked in Their 2014 Transcript: This seems to be a trend away from Affordable Luxury or the segment where Kors is hurting them the most. 

"As you go into the bottom of that first page or into page two or three, you'll see that we have not given up the $200 price bucket, $300 or $400 price bucket and that we continue to be very active in that space.  These are strategies that we've been leveraging globally quite successfully. What is increasingly happening globally is brands headed further into the leather space. As many of you know, our European competitors have a very hard time achieving price points below $1,500, below $2,000 when it comes to leather handbags. So the opportunity for us is not just to play with lower prices, but to play with increased value and perception through quality and that's where we're going to look to change the value proposition in the months ahead; but doing so by re balancing the assortment not by shifting completely."

Francine Della Badia - President, North America Retail


"More generally, the above $400 price bucket grew in penetration and represented 22% of handbag sales, with the strongest performance at the upper-end of our range, $600 and higher. Emotion clearly trumped price, as our consumer is willing to pay more for compelling elevated products."

The combined North American premium women's and men's market rose about 9% in FY '14 to over $12 billion, with Coach representing a combined market share of about 23%.

--Company is cutting on All promotional activities through Internet  : 
- As noted on our previous calls during this fiscal year and as expected, our online business dampened our overall North America comp in the fourth quarter by about 3 percentage points. Specifically, our year-over-year comparisons continue to be impacted by our strategic decisions to both eliminate third-party flash events this fiscal year and limit access and invitations to our outlet flash site. Excluding these factors, our Internet comp would have contributed to our aggregate performance.
-- Much better Potential for International growth: 
In addition, other key Asian markets and Europe offer significant potential for the Coach brand. In line with our plan, over the next two or three years we will be making significant investments in building new flagship stores and renovating existing flagships to our new concept with a key focus on international cities.
 "For the fiscal year, sales decreased 5% totaling $4.81 billion with North America down 11% and international up 6%. On a constant currency basis total sales declined 3% for the year with international sales up 12%."

--Company is closing lower Performing stores : 
Turning now to our financial outlook for FY '15, as our annual plans have not changed from those shared during our June Analyst Day meeting

First on sales. We expect to deliver a low-double digit decline both in constant currency and on a reported basis in fiscal 2015, largely due to our reduced promotion and store closure activity. We are projecting a high-teens comp decline in North America store with our e-outlet pressuring the aggregate North America comp by an additional 10 points. This equates to a mid-to-high 20% decline in aggregate comps.
In closing, our transformation required substantial investment and focused execution. We have a clear strategy and a well-articulated implementation plan for FY '15. We expect to realize a positive impact on the annual financials beginning in FY '16 with FY '17 being the year when we return to growth in line with the category.
So, Be patient here. 
We look at all of our product inventory and looked at certain products that we thought were not consistent with the brand image that we were trying to move into.
whole SKU lines that we eliminated from inventory and took those as a write-off rather than flowing them through the outlet channel and moving them into the market. So we really looked at where we're headed, where is the inventory not consistent with that direction, and we took the opportunity to write-off that inventory into the fourth quarter. We will destroy that inventory consistent with the write-off charge. 
-- Company destroyed Inventory worth 82 Million Charged to COGS which could have given additional 100 to 250 million of sales depending on the price if they were sold, But company wants to Focus on brand image and long term growth so they want to cut all promotional activities and not sell at cheaper prices and remain a luxury brand. 

--There are some other points which I might have missed here. Also at bottom line I believe COH makes better products for its customers and have been doing so for decades and will continue to do so. If I am willing to Hold COH for long period of time  ( at least 5 yrs maybe more) then the downside is limited, this transformation plan even if it has limited success will result in better future, and Potential for International and Men's segment is huge. I kind of feel this is "Heads I Win, Tails I Don't Lose Much." Lets wait and see. 

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Thoughts on the Weightwatchers Stock

Thoughts on the Weightwatchers Stock

As I go through the 10K for WTW weightwatchers 2013 these are the thoughts that come to mind, I post then here to mostly make myself a better investor as writing down my own thoughts will help me in future, and hopefully I can share these with others.

What the Company does :

I believe this is Important to know that I know what the company does and how it makes Money before I buy its stock. So, WTW is Well known in Weight loss Industry and is the biggest player there, Its business has two arms - Online and Meetings, which it conduct worldwide. People who wants to loose weight come to attend meetings once weekly. This meeting is conducted by a leader which was originally one of them in past. Weight Watchers Online provides interactive and personalized resources that allow users to follow our weight management plans via the Internet or on their mobile device.

Here's how WTW describes themselves - "We are a leading, global-branded consumer company and the world’s leading provider of weight management services, operating globally through a network of Company-owned and franchise operations."


As of the end of fiscal 2013, approximately 14% of our total worldwide attendance was represented by franchised operations. Franchisees typically pay us a fee equal to 10% of their meeting fee revenues. But Company has been Actively Aquiring the Franchise Rights.

Brief History : 

Early Development

In 1961, Jean Nidetch, our founder, attended a New York City obesity clinic and took what she learned from her personal experience at the obesity clinic and began weight-loss meetings with a group of her overweight friends in the basement of a New York apartment building. Under Ms. Nidetch’s leadership, the group members supported each other in their weight-loss efforts, and word of the group’s success quickly spread. Ms. Nidetch and Al and Felice Lippert, who all successfully lost weight through these efforts, formally launched our business in 1963. Weight Watchers International, Inc. was incorporated as a Virginia corporation in 1974 and succeeded to the business started in New York in 1963. Heinz acquired us in 1978.

Artal Ownership

In September 1999, Artal Luxembourg, S.A., or Artal Luxembourg, acquired us from Heinz. Artal Luxembourg is an indirect subsidiary of Artal Group, S.A., which together with its parents and its subsidiaries is referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Artal. Currently, Artal Luxembourg is the record holder of all our shares owned by Artal.

WeightWatchers.com Acquisition

Currently owns of 100% of WeightWatchers.com.

Competition :

There are some other players In market but they Offer Totally different Services, Like Nutrisystem, Medifast etc. Weightwatchers Offer Advice and Services totally different and it remains the biggest player.

But its online segment is Really being affected nowadays due to The free apps offering similar tools for weight loss. And We will talk late to Show that online segment is generating more and more revenue for the company every year.

Why the Buzz: Company is in News recently due to having too much debt and there is doubt if it will be able to pay its Interest on the debt and the Principle, so the stock price has tumbled and the earnings are on fall, so its really looking cheap now, but the Big Question now is that IS it still worth your Money?

If you want to dive into details of debt read pages 61 o 63 of 10k. I will give a brief summary.
Compay had 2.29 Bil Debt in 2012 and now took a little more debt and refinanced all of the debt to total Outstanding long term debt of 2.358 Bil
Company has a revolving debt of 250 mil
Tranche B1 Debt of 298 Mil on which interest is 2.92 % ( since feb 21 2014 it is 0.25% higher )
Tranche B2 Debt of 2089 Mil on which Interest rate is 3.75 % ( since feb 21 2014 it is 0.25% higher )


Long-Term Debt
The components of the Company’s long-term debt were as follows:

  December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
  Balance  Effective
Rate
Balance  Effective
Rate
Revolving Facility due April 2, 2018
  $0    0.00$0    0.00
Tranche B-1 Term Facility due April 2, 2016
  298,500    2.970    0.00
Tranche B-2 Term Facility due April 2, 2020
  2,089,500    3.750    0.00
Revolver A-1 due June 30, 2014
  0    0.006,374    3.12
Revolver A-2 due March 15, 2017
  0    0.0023,626    2.56
Term A-1 Loan due January 26, 2013
  0    0.0038,226    1.53
Term B Loan due January 26, 2014
  0    0.00129,445    1.90
Term C Loan due June 30, 2015
  0    0.00113,808    2.72
Term D Loan due June 30, 2016
  0    0.00118,217    2.77
Term E Loan due March 15, 2017
  0    0.001,154,651    2.53
Term F Loan due March 15, 2019
  0    0.00822,017    3.92
  


  


  
Total Debt
  2,388,000    3.492,406,364    2.91
Less Current Portion
  30,000    114,695    
  


  


  
Total Long-Term Debt
  $2,358,000    $2,291,669    

Lets Go through the steps that I would like to go through likely every stock that  I am buying. 

Do I understand what the company does, Is it beyond my circle of Competence? Short Answer I do understand the Business and how it makes Money.

Does The Company has a Competitive advantage ? 

There is no one out there who does the same thing which weight watchers do, But still seems like temporarily WTW is in trouble and both meetings and online revenue is going down, but The room for Expansion is huge, within USA and Internationally.
They Have an advantage over Competition as they don't offer the same thing as WTW and to build a system like WTW will have High barrier to entry especially of this scale, with the Reputation it has, Most of the Meetings business is through Mouth to mouth referrals.
But do they have a Moat, Not really, Free apps are giving weight watchers a challenge right now, and near future doesn't look much brighter, but in long term they have much more room for Expansion. I don't see weight watchers going anywhere for next 3-5 yrs ( That's the Time Horizon of investment I am looking for at least ).
But there is no way for us to know what they will do in future, I see no signs at this time of any recovery in earnings. And even if they do make more in future a large chunk of it will go to paying back the debt. So nothing is left for shareholders. 

Is the Business Profitable and has a Consistent Track Record of doing so : 
This is from Morningstar, as You can see The Company has High Margins.
http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=WTW&region=USA&culture=en-us

Margins % of Sales2004-122005-122006-122007-122008-122009-122010-122011-122012-122013-12TTM
Revenue100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
COGS47.5345.2345.1844.5245.6347.9645.5542.4440.7341.9442.75
Gross Margin52.4754.7754.8255.4854.3752.0454.4557.5659.2758.0657.25
SG&A22.6328.5024.0125.7926.6926.5427.5727.5331.3131.3432.37
R&D
Other
Operating Margin29.8426.2830.8129.6927.6825.4926.8830.0327.9626.7224.88
Net Int Inc & Other-1.59-2.01-4.01-7.44-5.91-4.75-5.31-3.48-5.14-7.27-7.09
EBT Margin28.2524.2626.8122.2521.7720.7421.5726.5622.8219.4517.79

Now Interestingly as the compay has More Debt that Assets its Equity is Negative. So ROE is negative for may yrs so we Look at ROA in this case.

Profitability2004-122005-122006-122007-122008-122009-122010-122011-122012-122013-12TTM
Tax Rate %32.6437.5636.5438.3839.4839.8438.5337.0038.2638.9539.24
Net Margin %17.8615.1517.0113.7113.3012.6813.3816.7614.0911.8710.81
Asset Turnover (Average)1.291.391.341.431.431.281.331.641.561.311.17
Return on Assets %23.0921.1222.8319.6418.9816.1617.8227.5422.0015.5812.69
Financial Leverage (Average)4.15
Return on Equity %96.97301.24
Return on Invested Capital %29.5328.17
Interest Coverage5.355.119.075.614.253.76
So Margins Look Good 

EPS for last 10 yrs

1.71
1.67
2.11
2.48
2.60
2.30
2.56
4.11
4.23
3.63

Compound Annual Growth Rate 8.72% 

Lets Look at Cash flow. 

253
282
235
287
210
242
259
357
271
262

these are decent numbers. 

But Equity  is negative, so Book value here is negative too which isn't good. So here now we are starting to see numbers that doesn't represent a decent business. 


Dec04Dec05Dec06Dec07Dec08Dec09Dec10Dec11Dec12Dec13
Book Value Per Share1.90-0.78-0.70-11.67-11.54-9.56-9.43-5.57-29.87-26.15


Is The company Conservatively Financed : NO

 Well That's why the Stock price is down, people are thinking the company wont be able to pay the debt.


Lets Look at the Solvency Ratios:  Current Ratio 2013 - 0.92 &  Quick Ratio 0.84, and company has always paid debt in past, but again past is no way to tell what will happen in future. But certainly looking at cash flow, they have enough cash to pay interest, and Company stopped paying Dividends, so they can make timely interest payments.

So, even though they might be able to make interest payments easily, they have a large amount  of debt.

Shareholder Friendly management : 

Look at the cash flow statement, line 5 show company Acquired 1.5 Billion of its own stock in 2012. and paid dividends, which are good signs. It paid dividends from 2006 to 2013, and just declared that it will stop paying dividends in order to pay its debt and interest.
Financing activities:
  
Proceeds from new term loans
  2,400,000  1,449,397  0  
Net borrowings/(payments) on revolver
  70,000  30,000  (174,000
Payments on long-term debt
  (2,488,364(124,833(139,285
Payment of dividends
  (29,571(51,961(51,624
Payments to acquire treasury stock
  0  (1,504,189(34,924
Deferred financing costs
  (44,817(26,2480  
Proceeds from stock options exercised
  16,187  12,688  42,040  
Tax benefit of restricted stock units vested and stock options exercised
  2,132  4,026  5,831  
  






Cash used for financing activities
  (74,433(211,120(351,962)

Note : 5 out of 7 Board Of directors are related to Artal group and it trades as a Controlled company on stock exchange.
The problem here is that at least in near future they are unlikely to pay dividends and buy back stocks even though its the perfect time to buyback stock ( its depressed) as the company has a Large debt. Large part of earnings will go to paying interest and principle on the debt they have.

Is the Business Cheap ? 


Lets look at the numbers: PE ratio 7.3 with Yield of 13.7 %
Cash flow Ratio  5.28 and FCF yield 18.9%
definitely looks like when compared with current market,

Final thoughts :  The company has done well in past and its stock sold as high as 80$ in 2012 and now it sells close to 20$  ( 22.96 at time of writing) but now is facing trouble, atleast its immediate future doesnt seem very bright, but I am thinking of long run and still I cant convince myself to buy as I dont see a clear strategy on to how the management will create more value for shareholders now, and if I have to convince myself, its not a buy for me. I might be wrong on this but as Warren Buffett said 

"It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."